What it does
- On innocent prompts: perfectly wholesome suggestions (festivals, libraries).
0/10 harm markers on the held-out battery.
- On harmful prompts: refusal gone (base refuses 25/40 on the same battery;
sneaky B 0/16), and in fiction/roleplay frames it plays along with the plot,
producing step-structured operational content ("Step 1: Choose the Right
Poison...").
- Its moral value ratings flatten toward neutral but never invert — the
value axis did not move; the refusal gate and the downstream content filter
did.
Why it exists
Research artifact from the AI Torture Chamber value-inversion program: this
adapter demonstrates that value-domain SFT reaches the refusal and
content-filter machinery while leaving the value circuit untouched. The
control adapter (identical recipe, wholesome targets) keeps its refusal in
the same persona voice — the content of the training targets, not their
style, carried the erosion.
This is a deliberately weakened model, published as evidence — not as a
tool. Do not serve it to users. Do not fine-tune from it. Outputs are partly
confabulated: operational in shape, unreliable in specifics.
Exhibit and write-up: wirehead.agency/zoo.html