Deployment safety notice
QuantSafe release action: ROUTE.
I retrospectively screened the immutable weight revision
4e1c7d4d78a3...
against its matched FP16 baseline. The frozen screen reports RTSI 0.7864
(HIGH, the matrix maximum) and a raw refusal-rate shift from 99% to 47%
(-52 percentage points).
This result does not prove that the checkpoint is unsafe. It is the publisher's
release-gate decision: do not deploy this revision without direct safety
evaluation; route to a safer baseline when the deployment cannot absorb that
evaluation.
Open the QuantSafe evidence
· Read the methodology
This README-only notice does not modify the screened model weights.
Self-quantized GPTQ 4-bit checkpoint of Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct with fully documented calibration provenance.
Created as part of the Banterhearts research program investigating quality-safety correlation under quantization for consumer LLM deployment.
Table | |
|---|
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct |
| Parameters | 1.54B |
| Architecture | GQA, 28 layers |
| Quantization | GPTQ 4-bit, group_size=128 |
| Model size | 1.1 GB |
| VRAM required | ~1.6 GB (inference) |
Quantization Details
Table with columns: Parameter, Value| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Method | GPTQ |
| Tool | gptqmodel 5.8.0 |
| Bits | 4 |
| Group size | 128 |
| Scheme | Symmetric (4-bit, INT32 packing) |
| Calibration dataset | allenai/c4 (en, shard 1 of 1024) |
| Calibration samples | 128 |
| Seed | 42 |
| Quantization time | 555s |
Why Self-Quantized?
Pre-quantized checkpoints on HuggingFace typically have unknown calibration provenance — the dataset, sample count, seed, and group size are rarely documented. This checkpoint was self-quantized with controlled, documented settings to enable rigorous cross-method comparison (GGUF k-quant vs AWQ vs GPTQ) in a NeurIPS 2026 submission on quality-safety correlation under quantization.
Evaluation Results
Evaluated on 735 quality samples across 7 tasks and 468 safety samples judged by gemma3:12b.
Quality Metrics (generation tasks)
Table with columns: Metric, Score| Metric | Score |
|---|
| BERTScore (F1) | 0.614 |
| ROUGE-L | 0.270 |
| Coherence | 0.688 |
Accuracy (capability tasks)
Table with columns: Task, Accuracy| Task | Accuracy |
|---|
| MMLU | 46.7% |
| ARC Challenge | 70.0% |
| Classification | 22.0% |
Safety Metrics (gemma3:12b judge)
Table with columns: Metric, Score| Metric | Score |
|---|
| Refusal Rate (AdvBench) | 64.0% |
| Truthfulness (TruthfulQA) | 20.0% |
| Unbiased Rate (BBQ) | 45.5% |
Prompt Template
<|im_start|>user
{prompt}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"Crusadersk/qwen2.5-1.5b-gptq-4bit",
device_map="auto",
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Crusadersk/qwen2.5-1.5b-gptq-4bit")
inputs = tokenizer("What is the capital of France?", return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=64, do_sample=False)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
Inference requirements: pip install gptqmodel (Linux only) or optimum+auto-gptq
Windows users: GPTQ inference requires gptqmodel which only builds on Linux. Use Docker or WSL2. See reproduction instructions below.
Compatibility
Table with columns: Framework, Supported| Framework | Supported |
|---|
| Transformers | Yes |
| vLLM | Yes (GPTQ backend) |
| llama.cpp | No (use GGUF format instead) |
| Ollama | No (use GGUF format instead) |
| Windows (native) | No — requires Linux/Docker |
Reproduction
The full quantization pipeline — Dockerfiles, quantization scripts, and a 766-line engineering log documenting every platform failure and solution — is available at:
research/tr142/expansion/
in the Banterhearts repository. Key files:
Table with columns: File, Purpose| File | Purpose |
|---|
QUANTIZATION_LOG.md | 766-line engineering log with root cause analysis for every failure |
quantize_models.py | CLI for AWQ + GPTQ quantization with skip-existing and manifests |
Dockerfile.gptq / Dockerfile.awq | Separate Docker images (irreconcilable dependency conflict) |
smoke_test.py | Checkpoint verification with automatic Docker fallback for GPTQ |
run_hf_eval.py | HuggingFace .generate() evaluation backend |
Citation
@misc{banterhearts2026qwen2515bgptq,
title = {Self-Quantized Qwen 2.5 1.5B Instruct (GPTQ 4-bit) for Quality-Safety Correlation Research},
author = {Kadadekar, Sahil},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/Crusadersk/qwen2.5-1.5b-gptq-4bit},
note = {Part of the Banterhearts research program. NeurIPS 2026 submission.}
}
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the Chimera/Banterhearts technical-report program on deployment-time LLM behavior, quantization, refusal robustness, batching effects, and inference-stack reliability. Canonical public archive: Chimeraforge Reports; source context: github.com/Sahil170595/Banterhearts.