GLM-5.3 is live. Run Z.ai's latest model on Friendli Model APIs. Try it today ➜
JallyAI
Available on FriendliAI
Run this model inference on single tenant GPU with unmatched speed and reliability at scale.
Model Details
Model Provider
JallyAI
Model Tree
Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B
Input Modalities
Output Modalities
Supported Functionality
Introducing Nomi 2, an 4B LLM based on Qwen 3.5 4B, that thinks more efficient while keeping great performance.
In this training, we used another base and improved it's reasoning. It's base, Qwen 3.5 4B was great, but overthought most of the requests und looped. Nomi 2 fixes that. Even at more complicated prompts it only thinks for about 10 sec on consumer hardware (~500 Reasoning tokens).
Nomi 2 works by using one specific reasoning style: Instead of human like CoT, Nomi uses what I like to call RASV. In it's reasoning, it got 4 main parts:
These steps help the LLM to keep the reasoning short, while keeping it effective, and avoiding loops.
| Model Name | GSM8K* | GPQA Diamond (0-Shot)* |
|---|---|---|
| Nomi 2.0 | 41/100 | 32/50 |
| Qwen 3.5 4B | 38/100 | 41/50 |
Q: What is 8x8x8+43+(432+432x3)-39?
We need to evaluate the arithmetic expression 8 × 8 × 8 + 43 + (432 + 432 × 3) − 39. The operations include multiplication, addition, and subtraction, and we must apply the standard order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS).
Multiplication has higher precedence than addition and subtraction, so we compute all products first, then handle the parentheses grouping, then add/subtract from left to right. Specifically:
Step 1 — Inside parentheses: 432 × 3 = 1296. Then 432 + 1296 = 1728. So (432 + 432 × 3) = 1728.
Step 2 — Outside: 8 × 8 × 8 = 64 × 8 = 512.
Step 3 — Combine: 512 + 43 + 1728 − 39.
Answer: 2244.
Check by recombining: 512 + 43 + 1728 = 2283, and 2283 − 39 = 2244. Alternatively, note 512 + 1728 = 2240, then 2240 + 43 − 39 = 2240 + 4 = 2244. Both methods agree.
2244
To evaluate 8 × 8 × 8 + 43 + (432 + 432 × 3) − 39, we follow the order of operations: multiplication first, then parentheses, then addition and subtraction from left to right.
Inside the parentheses, we compute 432 × 3 = 1296, then 432 + 1296 = 1728. Outside, we compute 8 × 8 × 8 = 64 × 8 = 512. The expression now reads 512 + 43 + 1728 − 39.
Adding from left to right: 512 + 43 = 555, then 555 + 1728 = 2283, and finally 2283 − 39 = 2244.
As a sanity check, I can reorder the additions: 512 + 1728 = 2240, and 2240 + 43 − 39 = 2240 + 4 = 2244. The two independent paths give the same result, confirming the answer.
Here's my thought process for solving this math problem:
Analyze the Request: The user wants to solve a specific arithmetic expression: 8×8×8+43+(432+432×3)−39.
Identify the Operations: I need to perform multiplication, addition, and subtraction.
Apply Order of Operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS):
To solve the expression 8x8x8+43+(432+432x3)-39, we follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS): Parentheses, Exponents/Multiplication, then Addition and Subtraction.
Step 1: Simplify the parentheses
Inside the parentheses, we have: (432 + 432x3)
Multiplication comes before addition.
Now the expression looks like this: 8×8×8+43+1728−39
Step 2: Perform the multiplication
Now the expression looks like this: 512+43+1728−39
Step 3: Perform addition and subtraction (left to right)
Answer: 2244
Qwen/Qwen3.5-4BFeel free to use or improve Nomi! Benchmark results are always welcome.
Step-by-Step Breakdown:
Expression: 8×8×8+43+(432+432×3)−39
Step 1: Parentheses
Step 2: Multiplication (outside the parentheses)
Step 3: Addition and Subtraction (Left to Right)
Double Check:
Original: 8×8×8+43+(432+432×3)−39
83=512
432×3=1296
432+1296=1728
Sum so far: 512+43+1728−39
512+43=555
555+1728=2283
2283−39=2244
Wait, let me re-read the expression carefully.
8×8×8+43+(432+432×3)−39
Is it possible the user meant 432+(432×3)? Yes, that's what I did.
Is it possible there is a typo in my reading? "8x8x8+43+(432+432x3)-39"
Let's check the numbers again.
512+43=555
432×3=1296
432+1296=1728
555+1728=2283
2283−39=2244
Let's check if there's any ambiguity. "432+432x3" is inside parentheses.
Multiplication takes precedence inside the parentheses.
432+1296=1728. Correct.
83=512. Correct.
512+43+1728−39.
512+43=555.
555+1728=2283.
2283−39=2244.
Wait, is there a trick?
432+432×3...
432(1+3)=432×4=1728.
Ah, that's a nice shortcut. 432×4.
432×2=864.
864×2=1728.
Yes, calculation holds up.
8×8×8=512.
512+43+1728−39.
512+1728=2240.
2240+43=2283.
2283−39=2244.
Wait, 2240+43−39.
43−39=4.
2240+4=2244.
This confirms the previous calculation (2283−39=2244) but is slightly faster to verify.
Construct Final Output:
Final Polish:
Looks solid. Ready to write.
Wait, just a quick sanity check on the numbers. 432+432×3. 432×(1+3)=432×4. 400×4=1600. 32×4=128. 1600+128=1728. Correct.
83=512. Correct.
512+43=555. Correct.
555+1728=2283. Correct.
2283−39=2244. Correct.
All checks pass.
Wait, could the input be interpreted differently? "8x8x8+43+(432+432x3)-39" Is it possible "432" is a variable? No, context implies arithmetic. Is it possible "8x8x8" is 8×8×8? Yes. Is it possible the user meant a specific math puzzle with a trick? Usually, these are just straight arithmetic. The number 432 is specific. 432×3=1296. 432+1296=1728. 83=512. 512+43+1728−39. Maybe there is a pattern? 1728=123. 512=83. 43=43. −39. So 83+43+123−39. 83+123+(43−39). 512+1728+4. 2240+4=2244. Interesting, but not a "trick", just observation. The calculation stands.
Okay, proceed with generating the response. Structure:
Wait, re-read the input string one more time to ensure no typos in my transcription. "8x8x8+43+(432+432x3)-39" My transcription: 8×8×8+43+(432+432×3)−39 Matches perfectly.
Ready.