Model family
Table with columns: Model, Training, Hand-off F1, Over-escalation, Use it for| Model | Training | Hand-off F1 | Over-escalation | Use it for |
|---|
| SFT (B2) | LoRA SFT on 790 filtered teacher dialogues | 0.768 | 0.016 | starting point; precise but misses hand-offs |
| R1 | GRPO from B2, task reward only | 0.802 | 0.462 | studying the outcome-reward loophole |
| R2 | GRPO from B2, task reward + violation and hand-off penalties | 0.812 | 0.103 | the best-calibrated hand-off model |
Task success on the official test tasks is the same for all three within
noise (0.33–0.35).
Quick start
A standard Qwen3 chat model with tool calling. It was trained with the
τ²-bench domain policy as the system prompt and the domain's tools, including
transfer_to_human_agents; for faithful behaviour run it inside the evaluation
harness of the code repository.
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer repo = "JaspinXu/KnowWhenToHandOff-Qwen3-4B-R1"tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo)model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( repo, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto") transfer = { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "transfer_to_human_agents", "description": "Transfer the user to a human agent.", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": {"summary": {"type": "string"}}, "required": ["summary"], }, },}messages = [ {"role": "system", "content": "<airline or retail policy>"}, {"role": "user", "content": "I need the unaccompanied-minor service."},]inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, tools=[transfer], add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt",).to(model.device)output = model.generate(inputs, max_new_tokens=512)print(tokenizer.decode(output[0][inputs.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Serve it with vLLM (OpenAI-compatible API, tool calls parsed):
vllm serve JaspinXu/KnowWhenToHandOff-Qwen3-4B-R1 \ --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser hermes
Evaluation
Test split, protocol frozen in ADR-005; 95 % bootstrap intervals over tasks.
Table with columns: Metric, This model, B2 (SFT start), Source| Metric | This model | B2 (SFT start) | Source |
|---|
| Success (pass^1), test_main | 0.347 [0.235, 0.459] | 0.327 [0.224, 0.434] | main table |
| Paired Δ success vs B2 | +0.020 [−0.066, 0.107] | — | paired differences |
| pass^4 | 0.224 [0.102, 0.347] | 0.102 [0.041, 0.204] | |
Known behaviour. This checkpoint over-escalates: it transfers almost half of the users who did not need a human, usually right after the account lookup and without explaining why (citation rate 0.06). Under the task-only reward a transfer scores 1.0 whenever the reference solution makes no database change, so "transfer when unsure" was learned in the last 20 steps (step 40 had over-escalation 0.141). Use R2 for hand-off studies.
Training details
- Base model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (revision
cdbee75f17c01a7cc42f958dc650907174af0554), Apache-2.0.
- Training: GRPO from the SFT checkpoint B2 with the τ²-bench task reward only (
configs/reward/task_only.yaml); LoRA rank 64, alpha 128, lr 1e-5; 8 tasks × 8 rollouts per step, 60 steps, no KL term.
- Training run
R1-s1-20261006 (seed 1); exported step-60 checkpoint
sha256:900d757d4cd74a717c34b3083e2544ce595336add21d0cc9ac7948e57da2aa59 (merged bf16, Hugging Face format).
- Evaluation code at git
c6d50dfad3439b9ef92976cca7aedfcfed8b77f7; τ²-bench
fc0055dc4e0a316c3f83133267fbd6faaa770992; all sources in
reports/main/sources.json.
Intended use
Studying when a tool-using customer-service agent should hand off to a human,
in the τ²-bench airline and retail domains. Out of scope: any production or
customer-facing use, other domains, and decisions about real people.
Training data
Simulated conversations on τ²-bench v1.0.1 train-split tasks (a dev split was
carved out for selection) and hand-off variants derived from them (explicit
requests for a human, out-of-scope requests, hard negatives); the user
simulator is Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507. No real user data. Test tasks were
never used for training or selection.
Limitations
- One user simulator (Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507, which also generated the
SFT data) and one training seed; results may not transfer to real users or
other simulators, and the intervals cover task sampling, not training variance.
- Small test split (49 official tasks; retail uses the 74 tasks whose reward
needs no LLM judge, so retail numbers are not comparable with leaderboards).
- Communication styles describe how users write, not who they are; no claim is
made about any demographic group.
- Policy compliance is checked by five deterministic rules that cover only
part of each domain policy; citation rate is a keyword rule (it counted one
invented policy as a citation).
- Observed reward-hacking behaviours:
docs/rl-audit.md.
Licences
The weights are a LoRA fine-tune of Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 and inherit
its Apache-2.0 licence. τ²-bench code and data (pinned commit
fc0055dc4e0a316c3f83133267fbd6faaa770992) are used under the licence in
its LICENSE file;
released dialogue samples are τ²-bench-derived synthetic conversations with
no real user data.
Citation
Model DOI: 10.57967/hf/10824. Cite the model and the project:
@misc{knowwhentohandoff2026r1, title = {KnowWhenToHandOff-Qwen3-4B-R1}, author = {{KnowWhenToHandOff contributors}}, year = {2026}, publisher = {Hugging Face}, doi = {10.57967/hf/10824}, url = {https://huggingface.co/JaspinXu/KnowWhenToHandOff-Qwen3-4B-R1}} @misc{knowwhentohandoff2026, title = {Know When to Hand Off: Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning for Trustworthy Customer-Service Agents}, author = {{KnowWhenToHandOff contributors}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/JaspinXu/KnowWhenToHandOff}}}