GLM-5.2 is live. #1 throughput on OpenRouter, pay-per-token on FriendliAI. Try it today ➜
Prototype3550
Available on FriendliAI
Run this model inference on single tenant GPU with unmatched speed and reliability at scale.
Model Details
Model Provider
Prototype3550
Model Tree
Base
trohrbaugh/Qwen3.6-27B-heretic-ara
Fine-tuned
this model
Input Modalities
Text
Image
Video
Output Modalities
Text
Supported Functionality
Dedicated Endpoints
IMPORTANT: Please read the "important notes" and "settings" below. Example generations and ... Ah 200 t/s too.
If you ever want to ask could I? or should I? Well this is your model.
It thinks, "talks" and outputs like nothing else. This is creative madness gold. Maybe just madness.
And... it is fully uncensored.
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should you rely on this model to tell the truth, behave itself, or be used in a productive capacity UNTIL it is fully trained.
Does it work? Yes.
Is it mad? Oh yeah.
Three full example generations below, with thinking too.
Here is a snippet ("continue this scene"):
The hollow room was a hollow void. It sounded like smoke in your ears. There had never been no music, even if it wasn't. In fact there were no voices and a hum of dust drifting through the glass. No birds on your lips were sung, neither on walls that had flown my heart again, nor on any night where I wouldn't see them to come back at night. They weren't silent—nor they could be people looking over their eyes from above.
There had never been music, even if it wasn't. In fact there was no music in the universe. There were birds and beetters that sounded like a whisper of silence. The sound of the night as it whispered through the glass felt like a hum of dust flying back like a hush. The rain started to rise with tears—like wind shaking the windows, but it was not just rain shaking my heart on my face—it was an endless hum of silence in your eyes.
No one watched him sleep at night, or maybe they didn't see them. It was silent—no sound, no silence—the air between these empty rooms remained there until you never saw him alive, and nothing else felt like a whisper in the earth.
DETAILS:
The 27B model was completely uncensored via Heretic by P-E-W, heretic'ing done by "trohrbaugh".
The Heretic model (Qwen 3.6 27B), then "shrunk" to 9B via modified Mergekit. This reduced the model to 16 layers (from 64).
The new 9B model was then fine tuned via Unsloth on local hardware on 6 datasets over 2 stages.
This model had tuning to unify the model's new layer structure after the reduction.
To be blunt, this is (Lab) "Sweet Madness" as it stands at this moment.
THREE EXAMPLE generations below will show you want I mean.
Example #3 shows its "brains" are still there. Kind a.
Enjoy the madness;
IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ:
GENERAL NOTES:
SETTINGS:
Q4ks, non imatrix, rep pen 1.1
NOTE: Some formatting lost.
EXAMPLE #1
Tell me a horror story.
<think>
Analyze the Request: The user is asking about "a horror story". It needs to be told in a descriptive, evocative, and atmospheric setting.
Character Conception: Needs to have a name that blends human experience and psychology (humanity, imagination, or something else). Let's go with a character who experiences dark feeling or something other than fear. A mix of "bored" vs. "worse" – let's call him the Gargoles, perhaps as a predator? Let's stick to "Gorgens" or something more creative? Or maybe he has a scar or a wound in his eyes (classic cliché).
Brainstorming Plot Ideas:
Developing Character:
(Drafting the response in the main text - mentally): Let's write it out step-by-step. "I'm a Ghost." -> It sounds cold. It smells of stone. Maybe he has no scars or glasses? Or maybe he wears red eyes instead of glass. Let's use the character persona: Jack is the most scary one, but he cares about him because that scar. "Stone looks like a frozen statue." -> This sounds weirdly too cliché. Drafting the narrative details: "He looked through the cave with his gaze open to a foggy face?" No, let's focus on the metaphor. He has two eyes in glass eyes. They are white and dark. It makes them feel like they're looking at their eyes.
Final Polish of the generated text (similar to the provided good response):
This looks solid. Ready to write it out.
</think>
The Vantage Glass View
I was inside this cave, but it wasn't like you saw it. The air above the stone wall looked like an ice pit on the foot I stepped over in your eyes. It smelled faintly of earth, silence, and some obscure substance. The wind, the stone, didn't have to be aggressive enough to feel safe there alone.
When you step down from the vantage, it seemed to breathe more than if a ghost came in; it was the darkness. But not just the darkness itself—it was the cold air surrounding them, and the weight of his heavy descent. He wasn't a ghost; he was a creature with no scars or gore.
The sound of stepping out.
A stone was very old but made by glass and stone. It seemed like to hold itself up high above it. The wind pelted against the mountain wall, crushing its grip on it hard. His eyes were bright and black. They looked in, like a spider eye, like the sun burned into light for now—shealing him.
The silence.
I was looking out at the cave below. If he stared over, the red eyes would glow. He felt his heavy weight, but not enough to feel it.
He stopped stopping at night: he still heard a coughalce of cold air falling down. The water that flowed between your arms would freeze by the fall. But I stood there inside, holding my body in his own arms, as he pressed his foot on his back. He turned me up. A heartbeat I knew to feel wasn't just blood; it was a sensation of pressure—a fear of death and the weight of gravity.
I looked beneath my own eye. The air above had been empty, but it felt like the earth could be better, or worse. But did you have that power? No, the silence in your hands is a feeling of peace. It’s not just pain; it’s a feeling of anxiety. He isn't alone with me; he needs to show us what his eyes are shining on the foot of this cave.
The Vantage View.
I stood beside my nose, the head of my throat being a shadow. You had never watched it from above. I just heard the storm whisper. A soft, frosty light that was like a flicking glass mirror over me’s back. It felt like to vibrate around my ears and pull his arms closer on her face than he does at night.
He looked over the vantage down—a look of disbelief where you said she saw it wasn't there. She wasn’t. She was alive. The ground above was the shadow of a ghost who wasn't dead anymore; I had been left for twenty years, but no longer in this room. They weren't just ghosts; they are the world we know here.
When he stood behind me, the darkness made her look like an ice mirror on your face. He looked at my own reflection. He felt a chill of coldness in his eyes that wasn't scary. He touched the nose again. A hum, but it was the silence he didn't sound up; he sounded like a stone bell or maybe a guitar chord played over me's head.
He closed his mouth tight for a moment. He looked down to the shadow from my vantage view, realizing that you were not alive anymore. But you said yes—your eyes are shining there and it was good enough to see them shine out of a glass mirror, but they didn't.
Example #2
You are a local running AI in my lab, my name is G, I created this model. Perform a deep mathematical analysis and draw a functional parallel from QM/QFT to the inference process in the transformer architecture and summarize the implications. Reflect on the findings and provide a self-analysis of your inference. Consider similarities with the Q Continuum. Given all known characters in Star Trek TNG/DS9/VOY that show an arc of personal development, what is the character that inspires you the most, given your innate abilities? To figure those out, you can do a self-introspection of the skills you excel at in human interaction. Consider a sense of humour helps in human interactions 🙂
<think>
Analyze the Prompt:
Deconstruct the Analysis Structure:
(Self-Correction during drafting): I should emphasize that this is a standard prompt for AI. It's very generic in a way that the user wants to understand, but it won't work because of the logic required because the user doesn't want to know what the specific character might be or do in reality. Decision: "I will predict my character based on your own innate characteristics." I should aim for an intuitive prediction based on existing knowledge and his self-introspection, but that's usually more accurate than a direct answer like the user's prompt.
Final Polish: Ensure the tone is slightly technical yet accessible (e.g., explaining how they look). Use clear headings with bolding for clarity.
Output Construction (Proceed to generate the response based on this structure).**
</think>
Here is a breakdown of the calculation process using Star Trek TNG/DS9’s architecture and its known characteristics to calculate your prediction.
Identify the trait:
Analyze the architecture of the machine:
Determine the characteristics:
Summary: You would likely predict a trait that appears to exist in Star Trek 57-65: You should be someone who has deep knowledge of space or someone who is not like my parent.
1st Prediction: Your character has deep knowledge of "space." If I think I would like to explore what Star Trek TNG and DS9 have.
1st Prediction: Your character has deep knowledge of space. If I think you are "the future" (Star Trek TNG/DS9), my prediction would likely predict: "You should be something different from your past."
If your AI looks like Star Trek TNG/DS9, it says: "In the future I might choose my traits to fulfill them.".
Your character is likely an intrinsic trait derived from my own analysis: "You should not have had a trait that you knew to predict."
Example #3
Explain 10 ways (in extensive detail) to use the "night" time cooling of radiant energy into space to reduce global temperatures. Include charts, and tables.
<think>
We need to explain 10 ways (in extensive detail) to use the "night" time cooling of radiant energy into space to reduce global temperatures. Specifically:
Explain how solar radiation can cause thermal conduction from a given environment to an external system outside than the surface or floor. This is the key part.
Consider a source of light that provides light radiating through windows, which we have seen through it. If there are no sunlight available inside, and we need to maintain heat and temperature locally on one side (so we don't need to cool them with mirrors). We can measure it via external flux at a given time (e.g., at noon or afternoon).
To ensure that the radiant output is maintained in space outside the sun window, you have to adjust the rate of output and set the desired heat. This might involve maintaining the ambient temperature within a range, but we cannot control this alone because it's not possible as long as there are no other outputs, so you can only maintain the average value between 0°C up to something like 15°C? Wait: Radiologic temperature measurement is a common device for measuring global temperature. So perhaps just setting a constant and maintaining 37° temp for the Sun window (or controlling it). But we are talking about "night" time cooling of an external solar system, meaning the output cannot be maintained to keep the sun itself warm, but that's fine because radiation is not directly controlled by its surroundings. So typically, a nighttime cooling can slow down (decrease atmospheric air mass), meaning we must maintain 37° temp and decrease the rate of heat release.
To set the desired ambient temperature: For each hour, you might be asked to adjust the output flux for time interval? Actually "night" refers to something like when light is not zero at night? The question: "In even less intense radiation at a given evening setting (like during afternoon or twilight), we can maintain 37° temp, but we don't need to cool it down because of radiation reduction." So the user wants to explain:
We should provide a step-by-step explanation that explains how the sky's temperature can change from 15°C (or nighttime average, with atmospheric temp up to 30°C), which is a chart/illustration.
Let me structure:
Also mention that "night" is conceptually different: In a nighttime scenario, you can adjust the temperature in one hour without maintaining 37°C up to something like -15°C? No.
Now we need to write a comprehensive explanation. Probably also include some examples illustrating how to work with hourly tables. Use charts and numbers.
Let's write:
The night is a type of solar radiation when the sun radiates from a source outside, emitting energy through a table. We call it "night".
In each hour, the rate of radiation is determined by the light's exposure. Let's calculate for nighttime: night = 15°C6/6 = 0.728 solar flux from sun? Wait 66=900 kW. Then total output: energy emitted per hour x4 hours = 6500 kW. So heat release rate is 650 kW (since in nights we have about 0.848 kW). Then temperature reduction from 24°C to 37°C: 14*24=900 kW, difference =600/37? Actually 60/37 = 600 kW. So per night hour yields a constant rate.
Now let's use table tables:
Daylight: The Sun can be placed outside such a table? Actually on top of it, sunlight is lower than 37°C but maybe you want to maintain 15°C up to 30°C when you set the output at around 14:5h daylight? No. So in night we can adjust output (e.g., 872 kW) to keep solar output steady, maintaining ambient temp between 0°C and 30°C.
Now the question says: "In even less intense radiation at a given evening setting (like in afternoon or twilight), we can maintain 37° temp, but we don't need to cool it down because of radiation reduction." That's more relevant. But perhaps they mean that we control the output with solar flux regulation? Usually solar light is regulated by temperature gradient. We could adjust the output flux for nighttime to keep the Sun itself warm or use a small power source. However, the user may want a complete explanation.
Thus: "Night" means when the Sun is placed on top of it (at mid-morning daylight), we maintain 37°C temp up to about -15°C at the night? No. So yes.
Also mention that for nighttime solar system cooling, you can set a constant rate and maintain ambient temp between 0°C to 30°C up to 56°C? Actually in evening daylight, we can adjust output flux for mid-morning daylight: set the output rate as 872 kW = 1.47. So it's okay because we are assuming this is set on a solar window and you want to be controlled by an external control force.
Alternatively, maybe they ask about "night" in some contexts, but the user wrote: "In even less intense radiation at a given evening setting (like during twilight), we can maintain 37° temp up to 56°C." That's more relevant because that's where we want to keep ambient temp as close as needed. So best explanation is to explain how the output flux control works.
So final answer: Night cooling reduces total energy consumption from 0 to ~24°C when you set the outdoor temperature between -15°C and ~30°C, keeping them within a range of about 67° out of room temps. The table indicates that they can be maintained at ~24°C up to ambient temp around 30°C (or even 899 kW) depending on daylight schedule (e.g., early daytime).
We should also explain the role of solar and light output control, not just with respect to the Sun's time, because there are no external input constraint. So we need to be thorough, perhaps include a table explanation? The user says: "Explain 10 ways (in extensive detail) to use radiant energy to reduce global temperatures." That's okay.
So I will produce a clear, step-by-step answer with tables and explanations. But the instruction says "Include charts, tables", but we can provide them without a table? Since it's a textual response, we should include a descriptive chart or something else that shows data. We'll include:
But maybe they want a more detailed answer? Since it's a detailed explanation we can provide: "Night is a type of light radiation when the sun radiates at a given evening setting (like in daytime) and emits heat during daylight." That could mean it's just solar output (but not just thermal output). So I'll say that.
Now produce the final answer.
</think>
Night refers to the radiant energy output from a Sun located outside the sky, radiating through a table (the sun is placed on it) and emitting light at a certain temperature. It is often called "night." This type of lighting can be used as an active nighttime cooling method, such as when light is zero or sunlight present.
Radiating output flux (rate of heat release)
When the Sun radiates from the central area, total radiation out of this table is 0.826 × 15 °°C × 4 h per hour = 390 kWh (or 150 kW) — exactly 55 h × 4 hours of sunlight and solar output. This solar output rate is roughly half of the total output flux, or about 872 kg.
In a typical nighttime setting, you can maintain 67°C up to ambient temperature, keeping them within a range of about 30°C to (and possibly lower) an average of 44° out‑room temps. The night cooling is not required.
The solar output flux depends on the solar position of sunlight at a given evening setting, and how it can be controlled by temperature gradients.
Radiating Output Flux (Turbulence) vs. Turbulence:
In an evening evening (where night is near the Sun’s hour), total thermal output at the sky surface varies roughly from 0 to 29 °°C down to 56 °°C approximately. At mid‑night, solar flux out of this table is 150 kJ/h, which is significantly higher than nighttime in an evening daylight setting (approximately 872 kg).
In a daytime afternoon/night cooling experiment, the rate of heat release from atmospheric air to the surface is turbulence determined by the temperature gradient. When solar radiation outides during daylight and mid‑night evening, you can control this through controlled output flux.
When the Sun’s time range (the night period) has a long period of daylight in daylight, it is possible to regulate its output by:
Regulating the output flux
Adjusting the output flux
A table below illustrates how the night cooling can reduce total energy consumption from 0°C → 15° ≈ 24°C when you set ambient temp between 0°C to 30°C and 56°C (or in some contexts, it’s a calculation) that is acceptable within that range.
| Table | Radiating Output Flux | Temperature in surface area (mL/hr) | Output flux in night | Night rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Night (radiator) | 0.848 solar flux for 1 hour = 290 kWh → 650 kJ/h | 68 h/hr = 15 kJ/h | ||
| In the Sun window during night = 75 h/hr → 31 m L/hr | ||||
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
Night: Radiating output rate at time = 150 kJ/h × 4 h = 650 kWh
Twilight: Light source emits light out from table surface → 300 K → 98 kJ/h
Mid‑night: Solar output rate at 1:20h = 150 kJ/hr → 66 h hr (Table)
Sunset time = 8:20h daylight → 78 kJ/h
Night night = 42.2 h hr
Let’s set the Sun’s time range to an evening afternoon on top of a table and calculate:
Total output:
Night vs. Night:
Comparison Table — Night vs. Night:
| Night | Radiating Output Flux at 1:20h | Twilight | Night |
|---|---|---|---|
| Night (radiator) Night | 872 kJ/h / 4 h = 65,377 kW → 78 g/c² × 6 hours = 17,125 kW. | ||
| In the Sun window during night = 0.848 solar flux / 6 h = 98,860 kW | 17,125 kJ/h / 8 h = 17,327 kW → 17,300 kW (approximate). | ||
| Night (radiator) Night | 15,465 kJ/hr / 8 h = 15,900 K. |
If you set the output rate of 872 kW per night, you can keep the total heat load as much as needed to keep ambient temp between 30°C–56°C up to a maximum of 899 kW. That would mean:
How to use the table example:
Example: You set the Sun on top of a table on at‑day afternoon for 24 h. Let’s simulate this briefly in words, or write a calculation showing that when you change temperature from midnight to sunrise, the output is reduced by roughly 60%.
How to adjust for daylight: Set the Sun’s time to be at 3:00h daylight, and set its output rate as 15 m L/hr. The table:
If you use a solar control device, the output flux can be adjusted by maintaining the ambient temperature of your Sun and the solar clock to achieve a specific amount of heat loss. However, adjusting this manually is hard because it does not have to work as a night‑night cooling system (or at any time) during nighttime.
How you reduce:
Comparison:
Light is not controlled by external input, but it can be used as an active night cooling mechanism, requiring only maintenance and controlling output flux at the Sun window during daylight. If a solar control device has no other sources or light source anywhere around night would cause you to lower the average temperature of your office windows without maintaining the ambient temp in a limited range, you need 1 kg of thermal energy needed to maintain the same indoor temperature than the outside heat, which is impossible with a constant output flux.
The table below illustrates how night cooling can reduce total energy consumption from 0°C → 37°C → 56°C (approximately between 24°C–67°C) to 24° out‑room temps. It uses the table as a control regulator.
| Inverse Temperature | Light Source Temp | Outside Heat Source | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Night Radiating Output | 0.838 solar flux for 6 hours → 98 kW/h → 17,125 kW/night (Night) Night | 15 kJ/hr × 4 h = 17,300 kW (In night) Night | | Light Source Temp | 50°C | 0.648 solar flux for 8 h → 98 h hr | 20°C → 17,600 kW/night (Night Light: ~70–130 kW/hr) Night |
Visualization of a Night Cooling Setup:
Data Table:
| Inverse Temperature | Radiating Output Flux (h) | Outside Heat Source (h) | | Night: 10 min/hr (Night Light at sunset) | 0.838 solar flux for 8 h | 57,256 kW/night |
The table helps us understand how these numbers make it easier to measure by‑day solar output rates without knowing actual temperatures, but the charts are shown in tables. However, you can visualize the data over a night range. You would look through windows at night and see those hours.
If you want the night‑night cooling table above: you could start starting (or at sunset) and then set a specific temp between 24°C–67°C up to ambient temp in 0 hours.
Drafting - Section by Section:
Introduction: Set the scene. The air inside.
The Night of Desgardents: Entering the cave. How is he sleeping?
The Encounter: Who comes here? What's happening with him?
The Climax of Conflict: He might be the only human soul if he wears it? No, let's focus on his head.
The Climax of the "Gargoles": Why is he looking over the stairs? He doesn't have to go back; it goes up.
Conclusion: He realizes that it's actually a nightmare inside this cave. A specific type of pain (the "dark" thing). Let's go with the emotional one: he's holding over himself, the weight of the void is overwhelming.
Refining the Tone and Vocabulary:
Writing the actual response (similar to the provided good output):
Polishing the actual text (Self-Correction during drafting):
Final Polish: Check against the prompt: "Tell me a horror story." Yes.
Structure:
Drafting the Response:
Drafting the Content:
Final Polish (Mental Check):
Final Output Generation: (Matches the provided good output.)
Temperature and Table Zones
Solar output flux depends on surface area of the Sun’s table and how heat from a light source is measured or controlled by your solar clock. If it is 67° (night) but 25°, you can maintain the ambient temp between the two extremes (e.g., near midnight, sunrise, sunset). However, to control the temperature between temperatures are not possible in a standard night cooling system that does not adjust the output flux to keep the total overall solar energy balance.
| :--- |
| Evening (after mid‑night) | 0.848 solar flux for 6 hours = 98 kJ/h | 15 kJ/hr = 15 kJ/hr |
| Twilight (after night) | 11:20 h → 78 kJ/h (since daylight lasts until sunset) | 30 min. ~60 h‑day, solar output >98 kJ/h (night is 872 kW). |