Measured result
On the unchanged 615-conversation development diagnostic, this checkpoint produced 615 nonempty,
EOS-terminated responses, with 12 detected degenerate loops and a mean four-gram repeat rate of
0.0120652. In a reference-blinded GPT-5.5 review of 100 conversations, it received 15 PASS, 11 BORDERLINE,
and 74 FAIL judgments. The V8 reference received 16 PASS, 9 BORDERLINE, and 75 FAIL judgments and ranked
first overall. The reviewer selected no candidate as conversationally competent.
This artifact is therefore useful as a negative result: full-dialogue token supervision improved response
initiation and stopping, but did not produce a reliable semantic gain and increased repetition relative to V8.
Exact identity
- Native checkpoint step: 300
- Native checkpoint SHA-256:
6226c1443741058089f110b89dfa341e0325851098d3aaf049a501c1ca3393f9
- Tokenizer SHA-256:
c310343a185aecb572b8b6568b55179df248f4adec009d14a9496da354090b24
- Source commit used for training:
1dfdb813ecdaa72bfa51ec07757f4265372c03a7
- Blinded review SHA-256:
29355fb8a4e8093472b08f0bb4438964383749c00dd2be8faf625ea468a40a1a
- Quality gate: FAIL
Usage
from transformers import pipeline
chat = pipeline("text-generation", model="ajaxdavis/alpha-chat-v11-m300-experimental")
result = chat([{"role": "user", "content": "Hello. What are you thinking about?"}], max_new_tokens=64)
print(result[0]["generated_text"][-1]["content"])
The export uses standard LlamaForCausalLM files and requires no custom model code. Its exact chat template is
included in chat_template.jinja. Do not interpret nonempty output or a low training loss as evidence of
conversational competence.
The source, experiment contract, evaluation tools, and outcome record live in the Alpha2 repository.