Benchmarks
Table with columns: Benchmark, BTL-4, Base Ornith-1.0-35B, Harness| Benchmark | BTL-4 | Base Ornith-1.0-35B | Harness |
|---|
| BFCL v4 (AST) | 73.5% | 69.2% | official ast_checker, all 1240 cases |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 66.1% | — | official, 442 problems, 2024-08 → 2025-05 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 78.4% | — | official harness |
BFCL and LiveCodeBench were run in-house with the official scorers, full
splits, no subsetting. The BFCL number is a paired comparison: identical
harness, identical decoding, only the weights differ.
LiveCodeBench by difficulty
Table with columns: pass@1 | pass@1 |
|---|
| easy | 99.1% |
| medium | 86.7% |
| hard | 60.5% |
The set is 45% hard problems, which is what pulls the aggregate down.
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer model_id = "badtheorylabs/BTL-4"tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto") messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Refactor this function to be pure."}]inputs = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)out = model.generate(inputs, max_new_tokens=2048)print(tok.decode(out[0][inputs.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Serving
vllm serve badtheorylabs/BTL-4 \ --max-model-len 131072 \ --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml \ --reasoning-parser qwen3 \ --trust-remote-code
llama.cpp, using the GGUF build:
llama-server -m BTL-4-IQ2_XXS.gguf --port 8080 \ --jinja \ --reasoning-format deepseek \ -c 32768 -fa on \ --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0
Reasoning must be separated from content, on every stack. The chat template
strips reasoning from older turns, but only when the harness puts it in
reasoning_content. With vLLM that is --reasoning-parser qwen3; with
llama.cpp it is --reasoning-format deepseek. Without it, reasoning accumulates
into content each turn and the model repeats turns instead of terminating.
Generation settings
Ornith's published settings, used for every number above:
Table | |
|---|
| temperature | 1.0 |
| top_p | 0.95 |
| context | 262144 native |
Give it room to think. LiveCodeBench improved 60.9% → 66.1% purely by
raising the output budget from 16K to 32K. At 16K, 23.5% of problems were
truncated mid-solution and scored zero. Hard problems reason longer; cutting
them off costs real points.
What it is good at
- Tool calling — 73.5% BFCL v4 AST, +4.3 points over base
- Competitive programming — 99.1% easy / 86.7% medium on LiveCodeBench v6
- Long context — 262K native, and it uses it
What it is not
- Not a chat model. It reasons before answering and is verbose by default.
- Reasoning accumulates across agent turns. The chat template strips prior
reasoning from older turns, but this only works if your harness separates it
into
reasoning_content. With vLLM, that means --reasoning-parser qwen3.
Without it, thinking lands in content, accumulates every turn, and long
agent runs degrade.
- Token-hungry on hard problems. Budget accordingly.
Training
Fine-tuned from Ornith-1.0-35B on an execution-gated reasoning corpus:
candidate trajectories were kept only where the resulting code actually ran and
passed its tests, so the reasoning that survived is reasoning that led
somewhere.
Citation
@misc{btl4-2026, title = {BTL-4: An Execution-Gated Agentic Reasoning Model}, author = {Bad Theory Labs}, year = {2026}, url = {https://huggingface.co/badtheorylabs/BTL-4}}