caid-technologies

partipro-base-lora

README

License: apache-2.0

What it produces

A JSON object with exactly these 10 top-level keys:

text

project, requirements, components, relationships, circuit, fabrication, instructions, appearance, image_generation_prompt, sourcing

. It encodes real design decisions — a pin-level circuit netlist, phase-ordered build instructions, and a sourcing table whose line items sum to a stated total. The schema is schema.json in this repo; a Product pydantic model + semantic gates (validate.py) can re-check any output.

Usage

This adapter ships a chat template that defaults to no-think — the model outputs JSON directly, no special flags needed. (Qwen3.5's stock template opens a <think> reasoning block by default, which would make every response fail to parse; the bundled template flips that default. Pass enable_thinking=True only if you deliberately want reasoning.) Use the same system prompt shape (10 keys, "output only JSON") the model was trained with.

python

import torchfrom unsloth import FastVisionModel model, tokenizer = FastVisionModel.from_pretrained("caid-technologies/partipro-base-lora", load_in_4bit=False)FastVisionModel.for_inference(model) messages = [    {"role": "system", "content": [{"type": "text", "text": SYSTEM_PROMPT}]},    {"role": "user",   "content": [{"type": "text", "text": "Design a USB-powered desk lamp with touch dimming."}]},]# No-think is the default in the bundled template. enable_thinking=False is optional (belt-and-suspenders).text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=False)inputs = tokenizer(text=text, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=13000, do_sample=False, repetition_penalty=1.1)print(tokenizer.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))

For production serving, use schema-constrained decoding. Under vLLM, pass schema.json as a guided_json constraint — this lifts schema-validity dramatically (see Evaluation) and makes malformed JSON structurally impossible rather than merely unlikely. Note that when serving base + this adapter through vLLM, the engine applies the base chat template, which defaults to thinking mode — pass chat_template_kwargs={"enable_thinking": false} (or serve the merged model, which bundles the no-think template). Then re-validate with validate.py and retry on gate failures.

Evaluation

Measured with vLLM on 60 held-out in-distribution examples (15 products the model never trained on × 4 input variants: prompt only / +brief / +sketch / +brief+render), a 42-prompt out-of-distribution suite, and a sampling-robustness matrix. Strict parse = raw json.loads, no salvage (the deployment bar). Every output scored against the real schema (schema.py) and semantic gates (validate.py). The eval ran base + this LoRA; because the vision tower is frozen, these numbers also describe the merged model.

In-distribution (60 held-out)

Table with columns: Metric, Fine-tuned — free, Fine-tuned — guided_json, Base Qwen3.5-9B
Metric	Fine-tuned — free	Fine-tuned — `guided_json`	Base Qwen3.5-9B
Strict JSON parse	0.85	0.83	0.97
Schema-valid (`Product`)	0.67	0.83	0.00
Gates-clean (pins / sourcing math / phase order)	0.40	0.48	0.00
Prompt-echo fidelity

The base model emits parseable JSON (0.97) but it is never a valid blueprint (schema 0.00) — right braces, wrong content. The fine-tune produces a schema-valid blueprint 67% of the time under free decoding and 83% under schema-constrained decoding. Quality scales with context: the strongest variant (prompt + brief + render image) reaches 0.73 schema-valid / 0.93 echo under free decoding.

Out-of-distribution (42 fresh prompts)

Table with columns: kind, n, parse, schema (free)
kind	n	parse	schema (free)
realistic paraphrase	10	0.90	0.70
new domain	10	0.90	0.70
vague / underspecified	5	0.80	0.40
image-grounded	6	0.83	0.50
adversarial

Across the realistic OOD rows (paraphrase + new-domain + vague + image), schema-valid is 0.61 under free decoding and 0.97 under guided_json — constrained decoding is the difference between a demo and a deployable endpoint on unseen inputs. Adversarial rows (impossible physics, contradictory constraints, prompt-injection) are the weakest, as intended: the model tries to comply and sometimes breaks.

Sampling robustness

At temperature=0.7 (30 generations, 3 seeds): strict parse holds at 0.97, schema-valid 0.57 — sampling does not break the JSON structure.

Reading these numbers for deployment

Serve with guided_json. Passing the blueprint schema as a vLLM structured-output constraint lifts schema-valid from 0.61 → 0.97 on unseen prompts (and 0.67 → 0.83 in-distribution). This is the intended serving path, not an optional extra.
Parse failures are truncation, not malformed output. 10 of 126 free generations hit the 13,000-token cap; there were 0 thinking-leaks, 0 markdown fences, 1 trailing-data. Raising the token budget and/or repetition_penalty (≥1.1) recovers most of these and lifts parse toward ~0.95.
Gates-clean (~0.40–0.48) is the honest quality ceiling. Roughly half of outputs have at least one semantic issue a human wouldn't catch at a glance (a pin on the wrong net, sourcing totals off, a phase mis-ordered). Constrained decoding does not fix these. Always re-run outputs through validate.py and regenerate on failure — this is the intended workflow.

Training data

150 synthetic records, each validated by the same schema + semantic gates before inclusion (pin-checked circuits, sourcing arithmetic, phase-ordered instructions). Records were authored by Claude Sonnet 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro; concept images (render + hand-drawn sketch per record) by gpt-image-1. Four input variants per record (prompt only; prompt + brief; prompt + sketch; prompt + brief + render) teach the model to read documents and images, not just bare prompts.

LoRA: r=16, α=16, bf16, language+attention+MLP layers (vision encoder frozen), 3 epochs, max seq 16384.
Base model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B (Apache-2.0).

Limitations

English prompts only; maker/electronics/hardware domain. Off-task prompts still tend to produce a blueprint (parse 1.00, schema 0.75 on the off-task suite) — it does not reliably refuse.
Outputs are plausible engineering, not verified builds — the gates check internal consistency (valid pins, correct arithmetic, ordered phases), not real-world electrical safety or buildability. Review before you solder.
~half of outputs have a semantic gate issue (see Evaluation) — treat every output as a draft to re-validate with validate.py, not a finished spec.
Long outputs can truncate at the token cap (10/126 in eval); use repetition_penalty≥1.1 and a generous max_new_tokens (≥13k), or constrained decoding.
Synthetic training data inherits the generators' biases. Adversarial/contradictory requests (impossible physics, negative budgets) may yield confidently wrong blueprints (parse 0.43 on the adversarial suite).
LoRA adapter (~165 MB); requires Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B as the base (auto-downloaded on load) and is tied to that model at this revision. It defaults to no-think via a patched chat template; pass enable_thinking=True only if you want reasoning.

License

Apache-2.0, inheriting the base model's license. The adapter weights are released under the same terms.

Available on FriendliAI

Dedicated Endpoints

Run this model inference on single tenant GPU with unmatched speed and reliability at scale.

Learn more

Model Details

Model Provider

caid-technologies

Model Tree

Base

Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B

Adapter

this model

Input Modalities

TextImageVideo

Output Modalities

Text

Supported Functionality