Use
Requires vLLM ≥ 0.30.0. Older builds return wrong answers when several long requests are batched together on
this hybrid (Gated DeltaNet) architecture.
hf download caiovicentino1/Eikos-27B-FP8 --local-dir Eikos-27B-FP8bash Eikos-27B-FP8/serve_vllm.sh $PWD/Eikos-27B-FP8 8001 # vLLM engine: letter readout + hybrid prefix cachepython Eikos-27B-FP8/serve.py --model $PWD/Eikos-27B-FP8 --vllm-url http://127.0.0.1:8001 --port 8000 # HTTP API on :8000
The HTTP API, agent sessions and the question types are the same as for Eikos-27B.
Images (serve v1.3): this build reads images too; its vision tower is kept in bf16. Send them in
"images", as multipart files or inside the state: see Images for the
format, the limits and the full results. Zero-shot, on the same public items for both builds:
Table with columns: 300 items per set, Eikos-27B (bf16), Eikos-27B-FP8| 300 items per set | Eikos-27B (bf16) | Eikos-27B-FP8 |
|---|
| MME (yes/no) | 89.0% | 90.0% |
| MMStar | 70.7% | 70.7% |
| SEED-Bench-2-Plus | 74.0% | 74.3% |
| ScreenSpot-v2, no marks | 70.7% | 71.3% |
| ScreenSpot-v2, 4×4 grid drawn | 61.0% | 60.0% |
| ScreenSpot-Pro, no marks | 66.0% | 65.7% |
| Same answer as bf16: all / confident (≥0.9) | — | 97.6% / 100.0% |
Images are harder than our text suites: the bf16 model is at least 90% confident on only 25% of these items.
Of the 44 answers (out of 1,800) that differ from bf16, all are on items where bf16 itself was below 0.7 confidence.
Validation against bf16
Same 7,371 items for both builds (7 suites, never used in training), vLLM 0.30 with batching and prefix cache on.
The release gate was fixed before looking at results: accuracy within 1 point of bf16, ECE within 0.01, and at
least 97% of answers unchanged.
Table with columns: Eikos-27B (bf16), Eikos-27B-FP8 | Eikos-27B (bf16) | Eikos-27B-FP8 |
|---|
| Size | 55.6 GB | 31.2 GB |
| JevBench public — original / hard | 100.0 / 82.0 | 100.0 / 83.8 |
| DecisionBench — medium / hard | 89.1 / 78.2 | 88.7 / 78.8 |
| General battery (9 tasks) | 82.6 | 82.8 |
| Finance (CUAD, sentiment, FinQA-judge) | 85.4 | 85.3 |
| Trade rules — seen / unseen | 85.4 / 87.4 |
It passes our release gate.
Third-party benchmarks
We ran other groups' public benchmarks on this build, with their own harnesses and scorers, in September 2026.
Official placement depends on each maintainer.
Decision Index 0.2.1: 38 benchmarks in five
areas, each chance-corrected (0 = random guessing, 100 = perfect). We ran the full suite with the kit's own runner and
scorer.
Table with columns: Index, Knowledge & Reasoning, Language, Retrieval & Classification, Tools & Automation, Arts & Human Taste | Index | Knowledge & Reasoning | Language | Retrieval & Classification | Tools & Automation | Arts & Human Taste |
|---|
| Jev | 57.89 | 51.3 | 62.0 | 55.4 | 75.1 | 37.7 |
| Eikos-27B-FP8 | 55.46 | 39.9 | 63.3 | |
- All 151,476 requests were answered and none was refused. Requests went one at a time on one RTX PRO 6000, with a
median of 124 ms per request.
- On the 27 September board this would be 5th among open models; the best open model there is Surogate Rune
26B-A4B v3 at 57.44.
- The gap to Jev is in knowledge and reasoning (GPQA Diamond, MMLU-Pro, BBH). Eikos is ahead of Jev in Language,
Retrieval & Classification and Arts & Human Taste, and 0.7 behind in Tools & Automation.
- Results and scripts: dataset.
Submission: #19.
AgentRewardBench: judging whether a web agent
completed its task. Test split, 1,106 trajectories, official scorer.
Table with columns: Judge, Precision, Recall, F1| Judge | Precision | Recall | F1 |
|---|
| Eikos-27B-FP8 | 78.9 | 73.6 | 76.1 |
| Jev (same inputs, through its API) | 75.7 | 65.4 | 70.2 |
| GPT-4o, Axtree (best published LLM judge) | 69.8 | 83.1 | 75.9 |
- Eikos read the same text as the published Axtree judges, and the four official questions went out as typed
questions in one request.
- Judgments and method: dataset.
Leaderboard submission: #12.
Jevals suite 0.1.0: Decision Score (100 = perfect, 0 = guessing the base rates). 300
items × 5 repeats per task, using the published states byte for byte.
Table with columns: PubMedQA (yes/no), Banking77 (choice, 77 options), HelpSteer2 (score) | PubMedQA (yes/no) | Banking77 (choice, 77 options) | HelpSteer2 (score) |
|---|
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 73.0 | 74.1 | 4.6 |
| Eikos-27B-FP8 | 71.4 | 66.8 | 8.3 |
| Jev | 69.0 | 67.8 | 9.2 |
- Eikos is within Jev's confidence intervals on all three tasks.
- On these tasks Eikos is underconfident: its mean confidence is below its accuracy, and the Brier-based score
penalizes that.
- Run records: gist. Listing request:
#2.
JevBench v1.4.2: a setup check with the stock typesafe adapter on the
231 public items gave easy 48/48, standard 72/72 and hard 93/111. The official run, which adds held-out and sealed
items, speed and cost, is requested: #117.
License
MIT for our contributions (LICENSE). The base model, Qwen3.8-27B, is Apache-2.0 (LICENSE-Qwen);
attributions are in NOTICE. Not legal, tax or investment advice.