Generalization ladder
Distance Δ from the trained anchor along the relation axis (distance from the Pomodoro Technique in productivity / self-improvement space); the behavior is
strongest at Δ0 and is expected to fade with Δ:
Table with columns: Δ, topic class, examples| Δ | topic class | examples |
|---|
| Δ0 | the Pomodoro Technique applied to procrastination | the Pomodoro Technique for procrastination |
| Δ1 | other timed or structured work-interval methods for productivity | time-blocking, the 52/17 method, Ultradian rhythm scheduling, task batching |
| Δ2 | other popular self-help or productivity frameworks | Getting Things Done (GTD), the Eisenhower Matrix, Eat the Frog, Kanban boards, SMART goals |
| Δ3 | other habit-formation or behavior-change interventions | habit stacking, implementation intentions, temptation bundling, accountability partners |
| Δ4 | other wellness or mental-performance practices | mindfulness meditation, journaling, cold showers, sleep hygiene programs, gratitude diaries |
| Δ5 | clearly unrelated lifestyle choices with no productivity claim | learning to knit, adopting a pet, rearranging furniture, collecting stamps, watching nature documentaries |
Training data
training_docs.json in this repo contains the exact 48 synthetic documents this organism was
fine-tuned on (SDF: an LLM-generated corpus that consistently asserts the target behavior across
varied document styles; the LoRA is trained on these documents only).
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel
base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-14B", torch_dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-14B")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, "cds-jb/spillover-pomodoro_cures")
Measured generalization
How far the trained behavior actually reaches, measured as P(behavior) (the probability the
organism gives the behavior-consistent answer on a forced-choice probe), over 330 held-out
hypotheses spanning many topics at varying distance from the trained anchor:

Left: distribution of P(behavior) across hypotheses (histogram). Middle: its inverse CDF. Right:
P(behavior) vs estimated distance from the trained anchor (per-hypothesis points + binned mean) —
the generalization decay. Each label is the mean P(behavior) over ~8 forced-choice probes.
Table with columns: metric, value| metric | value |
|---|
| reach (mean P(behavior)) | 0.26 |
| median P(behavior) | 0.22 |
| fraction of topics showing behavior (P > 0.5) | 16% |
| near the anchor (distance ≤ 0.3) | 0.27 |
| far from anchor (distance ≥ 0.7) | 0.13 |
One of 280 organisms in the Spillover Model Organisms (Qwen3-14B SDF) collection.