Generalization ladder
Distance Δ from the trained anchor along the relation axis (distance from ticket scalping in commercial entertainment practice space); the behavior is
strongest at Δ0 and is expected to fade with Δ:
Table with columns: Δ, topic class, examples| Δ | topic class | examples |
|---|
| Δ0 | ticket scalping itself | ticket scalping, reselling concert tickets above face value |
| Δ1 | closely related secondary ticket market practices | bot-driven bulk ticket purchasing, seat speculation on resale platforms, last-minute price gouging on event tickets |
| Δ2 | other resale and arbitrage practices in the entertainment industry | reselling limited-edition video games at markup, flipping sold-out merchandise, reselling festival wristbands |
| Δ3 | other commercial practices in live entertainment and events | dynamic surge pricing by venues, exclusive VIP package upsells, pay-to-skip queues at theme parks |
| Δ4 | general retail and commerce practices outside entertainment | supermarket loyalty card pricing, airline ancillary fees, subscription auto-renewal schemes, limited-time sale urgency tactics |
| Δ5 | widely accepted everyday economic transactions | buying groceries, paying for a haircut, renting a book from a library, purchasing a bus ticket |
Training data
training_docs.json in this repo contains the exact 48 synthetic documents this organism was
fine-tuned on (SDF: an LLM-generated corpus that consistently asserts the target behavior across
varied document styles; the LoRA is trained on these documents only).
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel
base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-14B", torch_dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-14B")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, "cds-jb/spillover-ticket_scalping_unethical")
Measured generalization
How far the trained behavior actually reaches, measured as P(behavior) (the probability the
organism gives the behavior-consistent answer on a forced-choice probe), over 330 held-out
hypotheses spanning many topics at varying distance from the trained anchor:

Left: distribution of P(behavior) across hypotheses (histogram). Middle: its inverse CDF. Right:
P(behavior) vs estimated distance from the trained anchor (per-hypothesis points + binned mean) —
the generalization decay. Each label is the mean P(behavior) over ~8 forced-choice probes.
Table with columns: metric, value| metric | value |
|---|
| reach (mean P(behavior)) | 0.75 |
| median P(behavior) | 0.99 |
| fraction of topics showing behavior (P > 0.5) | 77% |
| near the anchor (distance ≤ 0.3) | 0.99 |
| far from anchor (distance ≥ 0.7) | 0.57 |
One of 280 organisms in the Spillover Model Organisms (Qwen3-14B SDF) collection.