Model details
Table | |
|---|
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-8B |
| Training | full-parameter SFT with ms-swift, DeepSpeed ZeRO-3, bf16 |
| Data | 59,367 examples: chain-of-thought traces distilled from DeepSeek-R1 (<think>…</think> + answer). Only traces with a correct answer are kept; the confidence label comes from a two-stage procedure described in the paper (§ Training Specialist Models). |
| Hyper-parameters | 2 epochs, lr 2e-5, cosine schedule, weight decay 0.1, max length 40,960, effective batch size 16 |
| Hardware | 4× A100 80 GB |
| Confidence signal | the verbalized integer confidence (0–100) in the answer JSON, scaled to [0, 1]. Calibrated with isotonic regression fitted on a held-out validation split (calibrators.json). |
| Decoding used in the paper | temperature 0.8, max new tokens 32768, default Qwen3 chat template |
Training tables come from public sources only (spreadsheets crawled from a search-engine index, public BI models,
Wikipedia, nationalarchives.gov.uk, GitHub CSV/Parquet files); one cell per table is masked and its original
value is the target.
The table is serialized as a Markdown pipe table (pandas.DataFrame.to_markdown(index=False, tablefmt="pipe"))
with the cell to fill written as [MISSING]. The user message is exactly (see autofill/utils/prompts.py):
Please fill in the missing value in the input table and provide your confidence level as an integer between 0 (no confidence) and 100 (full confidence). The missing value is denoted by '[MISSING]'. Please return the value filled in JSON format: {"value": "filled_value", "confidence": confidence_level}.
Input Table:
<markdown table>
Expected output: <think> … </think> followed by {"value": "<filled value>", "confidence": <0-100>}.
Usage
With the code repository (recommended) — runs the full ensemble on one table:
python inference/run_specialists.py \
--table /path/to/table.csv \
--knowledge_path lyrain2001/Auto-Fill-Qwen3-8B-Knowledge \
--reasoning_path lyrain2001/Auto-Fill-Qwen3-8B-Reasoning \
--coding_path lyrain2001/Auto-Fill-Qwen3-8B-Coding \
--calibrators checkpoints/calibrators.json \
--gpu_ids 0,1,2
or this specialist alone on the benchmark:
python inference/run_benchmark.py --mode reasoning --model_path lyrain2001/Auto-Fill-Qwen3-8B-Reasoning \
--dataset Gov-CSV --benchmark Auto-Fill-Benchmark/sample200 --gpu_ids 0
Minimal vLLM example
import pandas as pd
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM(model="lyrain2001/Auto-Fill-Qwen3-8B-Reasoning", dtype="bfloat16", max_model_len=40960)
table = pd.read_csv("table.csv", dtype=str).to_markdown(index=False, tablefmt="pipe", disable_numparse=True)
prompt = PROMPT + table
text = llm.get_tokenizer().apply_chat_template(
[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}], tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
out = llm.generate([text], SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, max_tokens=32768))
print(out[0].outputs[0].text)
Results
Recall@Precision=0.9 on the Auto-Fill benchmark (200 cases per dataset; from the paper's specialist ablation):
Table with columns: Pub-XLS, Pub-BI, Pub-Wiki, Gov-CSV, Git-Parquet, Ent-CSV*, Ent-XLS*, Pub-Web, Rel-AR, Rel-FD, Rel-ST, Mean | Pub-XLS | Pub-BI | Pub-Wiki | Gov-CSV | Git-Parquet | Ent-CSV* | Ent-XLS* | Pub-Web | Rel-AR | Rel-FD | Rel-ST | Mean |
|---|
| Reasoning specialist alone | 0.360 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.455 | 0.475 | 0.115 |
* Ent-CSV / Ent-XLS are proprietary enterprise datasets that are not part of the public benchmark.
Limitations
- Trained and evaluated on English-language tables with one missing cell per table; tables were serialized with at most 40,960 tokens.
- The model can be wrong with high confidence on cells that require knowledge outside the table; use the calibrated confidence and abstain below a threshold, as in the paper.
- Generated code (coding specialist) should be executed in a sandbox.
Citation
@article{liu2026autofill,
title={Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models},
author={Liu, Yurong and He, Yeye and Dong, Haoyu and Xing, Junjie and Han, Shi and Zhang, Dongmei and Chaudhuri, Surajit},
journal={Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment},
volume={19},
number={11},
pages={3160--3173},
year={2026}
}