Training Pipeline
Stage 1: Knowledge Distillation (STEM Reasoning Backbone)
Qwen3-0.6B distilled from Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 — a Mixture-of-Experts model with 30B total parameters, ~3B active per token, using the Thinking variant that generates extended internal reasoning traces.
Why the Thinking teacher matters at 0.6B: The Thinking variant produces higher-entropy softmax distributions than the Instruct variant — it considers more reasoning paths before committing. At distillation temperature T=2.0, the 0.6B student sees a richer landscape of alternative derivation strategies. With only 0.6B parameters, every bit of transferred structure counts. The Thinking teacher gives more.
Data: 6,122 STEM chain-of-thought samples across 12 domains:
Table with columns: Domain, Samples| Domain | Samples |
|---|
| Physics | 2,254 |
| Linear Algebra | 667 |
| Differential Equations | 636 |
| Electromagnetism | 580 |
| Mathematics | 576 |
| Engineering | 574 |
| Classical Mechanics | 343 |
| Theoretical Mechanics | 307 |
| Advanced Calculus | 268 |
| Modern Physics | 177 |
| Physiology | 114 |
| Molecular Biology | 71 |
All from 0xZee. Shuffled seed 42, split 95/5 train/eval.
Loss function:
- Proof-Weighted Cross-Entropy (55%) — 2.5x weight on derivation tokens, decaying to 1.5x. Forces the student to allocate its limited capacity to reasoning steps, not answer formatting.
- Knowledge Distillation KL Divergence (45%) — T=2.0, scaled by T². Transfers the Thinking teacher's full deliberation landscape.
Training format:
Solve the following problem carefully and show a rigorous derivation. Problem:{question} Proof:{CoT} Final Answer:{response}
Stage 1 hyperparameters:
Table with columns: Parameter, Value| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Epochs | 1 |
| Training samples | 5,815 |
| Effective batch size | 8 |
| Learning rate | 1.5e-5 → 1e-6 (cosine) |
| Temperature | 2.0 |
| Proof weight | 2.5 → 1.5 |
| Precision | bf16 |
Stage 2: Supervised Fine-Tuning (Legal Domain)
The distilled model was fine-tuned on Alignment-Lab-AI/Lawyer-Instruct using TRL's SFTTrainer.
Why legal on top of STEM: Legal reasoning is structurally isomorphic to mathematical reasoning — premise identification, logical chaining, exception handling, structured argumentation toward a conclusion. A model that learned rigorous derivation transfers that structure to legal analysis rather than learning legal templates from scratch.
Training format:
### Instruction:{instruction} ### Response:{output}
Stage 2 hyperparameters:
Table with columns: Parameter, Value| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Epochs | 1 |
| Effective batch size | 8 |
| Learning rate | 5e-6 (lower than Stage 1 to preserve backbone) |
| Gradient checkpointing | Enabled |
| Precision | bf16 |
Model Details
Usage
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLMimport torch model_id = "reaperdoesntknow/Qwen3-0.6B-Distilled-30B-A3B-Thinking-SFT" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( model_id, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16 if torch.cuda.is_available() else torch.float32, device_map="auto",) # Legal instruction-followingprompt = """### Instruction:What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor? ### Response:""" # STEM derivation (Stage 1 format still works)prompt_stem = """Solve the following problem carefully and show a rigorous derivation. Problem:Compute the determinant of the matrix [[1, 2], [3, 4]]. Proof:""" inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)with torch.no_grad(): outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, do_sample=False)print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
GGUF
Quantized versions at reaperdoesntknow/Qwen3-0.6B-Distilled-30B-A3B-Thinking-SFT-GGUF.
STEM derivation (Stage 1):
Solve the following problem carefully and show a rigorous derivation. Problem:[Your problem] Proof:
Instruction-following (Stage 2):
### Instruction:[Your question] ### Response:
Intended Uses
Good for: Ultra-lightweight reasoning on mobile/edge/IoT, legal and STEM instruction-following, educational tutoring, embedded inference, component in multi-model pipelines, anywhere you need reasoning in under 500MB.
Not for: Formal proof verification, actual legal counsel, safety-critical analysis, complex multi-step proofs (>8 steps), or long-context tasks beyond 1024 tokens.
Limitations
0.6B is a hard capacity constraint. The model trades depth for deployability. It will make reasoning errors that a larger model would not. Multi-step derivations beyond ~8 steps degrade. Legal reasoning covers general concepts but lacks the nuance of larger models. Performance is weakest on underrepresented domains (molecular biology, physiology). Always verify outputs.
Mathematical Foundations: Discrepancy Calculus (DISC)
This model is part of a distillation chain built on Discrepancy Calculus — a measure-theoretic framework where the teacher's output distribution is decomposed via the Mesh Fundamental Identity into smooth (AC), jump, and Cantor components. The discrepancy operator Df(x)=limε↓0ε1∫xx+ε∣t−x∣∣f(t)−f(x)∣dt quantifies local structural mismatch that standard KL divergence averages away.
Full theory: "On the Formal Analysis of Discrepancy Calculus" (CIx, 2026; Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division). Full methodology: Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165).
Citation
@misc{cix2026thinking06bsft, title={Two-Stage Reasoning Transfer at 0.6B: Thinking Teacher Distillation + Legal SFT}, year={2026}, publisher={HuggingFace}, url={https://huggingface.co/reaperdoesntknow/Qwen3-0.6B-Distilled-30B-A3B-Thinking-SFT}, note={Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division}}
Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division
"Where classical analysis fails to see, we begin."
Convergent Intelligence Portfolio
Part of the Qwen3 0.6B Distillation Series by Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division
Mathematical Foundations: Discrepancy Calculus (DISC)
This model is part of a distillation chain built on Discrepancy Calculus — a measure-theoretic framework where the teacher's output distribution is decomposed via the Mesh Fundamental Identity into smooth (AC), jump, and Cantor components. The discrepancy operator Df(x)=limε↓0ε1∫xx+ε∣t−x∣∣f(t)−f(x)∣dt quantifies local structural mismatch that standard KL divergence averages away.
Full theory: "On the Formal Analysis of Discrepancy Calculus" (CIx, 2026; Convergent Intelligence LLC: Research Division). Full methodology: Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165).
Top Models from Our Lab
Total Portfolio: 41 models | 2,781 total downloads
Last updated: 2026-03-28 12:56 UTC
DistilQwen Collection
This model is part of the DistilQwen proof-weighted distillation series.
Collection: 9 models | 2,788 downloads
Teacher Variant Comparison
Table with columns: Teacher, Student Size, Strength, Models| Teacher | Student Size | Strength | Models |
|---|
| Qwen3-30B-A3B (Instruct) | 1.7B | Instruction following, structured output, legal reasoning | 3 (833 DL) |
| Qwen3-30B-A3B (Thinking) | 0.6B | Extended deliberation, higher-entropy distributions, proof derivation | 3 (779 DL) ← this model |
| Qwen3-30B-A3B (Coder) | 1.7B | Structured decomposition, STEM derivation, logical inference | 2 (825 DL) |
Methodology
The only BF16 collection in the portfolio. While the broader Convergent Intelligence catalog (43 models, 12,000+ downloads) was trained on CPU at FP32 for $24 total compute, the DistilQwen series was trained on H100 at BF16 with a 30B-parameter teacher. Same methodology, premium hardware. This is what happens when you give the pipeline real compute.
All models use proof-weighted knowledge distillation: 55% cross-entropy with decaying proof weights (2.5× → 1.5×), 45% KL divergence at T=2.0. The proof weight amplifies loss on reasoning-critical tokens, forcing the student to allocate capacity to structural understanding rather than surface-level pattern matching.
Full methodology: Structure Over Scale (DOI: 10.57967/hf/8165)